INNOVADERM CRO IS NOW INDERO.

Essential Requirements for Adaptive Designs in Clinical Trials

Diane Potvin

Diane Potvin

Senior Statistical Advisor

Author picture

Adaptive design in clinical trials is a dynamic and innovative approach, but it requires certain key elements to ensure its successful implementation.

  1. Efficiency and Integrity
    The purpose of an adaptive trial design is to increase efficiency without compromising the integrity and validity of the results. For this to be accomplished, extensive and adequately maintained clinical trial planning is required.
  2. Biostatistician Support
    More statistical support from a biostatistician that is well versed in adaptive trial design methodologies is needed before the trial is initiated.
  3. Regulatory Interaction
    Adaptive trial designs also typically require more interaction with regulatory bodies prior to initiating the trial to establish agreement on the proposed strategies.
  4. Independent Analysis
    They also generally require the use of a separate and independent group of biostatisticians and programmers who will only be involved in the interim analyses, particularly for unblinded adaptations.
  5. Access Control
    Access to the repository of documents, programs and data must be available to an unblinded group only and the minimally required information should be shared with the blinded team members following adaptive modifications to avoid bias.
  6. Clean Data Analysis
    Monitoring of patient data generated up to the interim analysis timepoint must be completed and the data hard locked (or soft locked depending on the scope of the interim analysis) before performing the interim analysis. This requires more time and effort from the clinical operations team.
  7. Drug Supply Flexibility
    Adaptive trial designs also often require a good and flexible drug supply, especially if one or more cohorts need to be expanded or terminated.
  8. Randomization Adaptation
    By employing a response-adaptive randomization, an adaptive trial design may also modify the randomization scheme, which allows changes to the randomization probabilities. This means shifting the randomization probabilities in favour of arms that showed promise during the course of the trial or stopping poorly performing arms altogether (i.e. effectively reducing their randomization probability to zero). This implies more complex randomization strategies and programming, which may incur a cost and more potential for error.

 Click this link to download the PDF version.

Read the full article: Potvin D, D’Angelo P, Bennett S, Jankicevic J, Bissonnette R. Adaptive designs in dermatology clinical trials: Current status and future perspectives. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Apr 15. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20030. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38619384. 

SHARE THIS POST

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Do not miss out on valuable insights and research updates. Join our scientific community today!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Jeff Smith

Chef de la direction

Jeff Smith, Chef de la direction d’Indero Recherches, apporte près de 30 ans d’expérience dans l’industrie pharmaceutique et CRO, s’étant distingué par son leadership exceptionnel, sa vision stratégique et son innovation. L’expertise de Jeff couvre des opérations mondiales, la gestion de la croissance, ainsi que la promotion d’une culture d’entreprise collaborative. Ses atouts en matière de création de valeur, de gestion des partenaires et d’opérations CRO ont toujours contribué au succès dans ses fonctions précédentes. Sous la direction de Jeff, Indero continue d’étendre ses capacités, faisant progresser les connaissances médicales et les nouvelles thérapies en dermatologie et en rhumatologie.